Page 31 - SST Class 08
P. 31
raised and this was between the British East India tillers were recognised as proprietors. Under the
Company and the Landlords of Bengal. Lord Ryotwari settlement system, the company recog-
Cornwallis, who was the British East India’s nised mirasdars as the sole proprietors of land,
leader had come to India as the post of dismissing tenants’ rights completely. Only in
Governor-General. villages where no mirasdars system existed, were
The Permanent Settle- the villagers holding permanent occupancy rights
ment of the Bengal was recognised as landholders responsible for the
the famous measures of payment of land revenue. The impacts were
Lord Cornwallis. It cre- more visible such as :
ated the agreement that g the supply side of land increased and land
the landlords will have to prices fell.
be perpetual and heredi- g Interest rates increased. The rates were so
tary rights on the lands, it high that the cultivator was at best could
will be the start as they pay only interest.
will pay the full amount
till the fixed revenue to Mahalwari System
the British Government. Lord Cornwallis When the Zamindari System as well as Ryotwari
They have the rights to transfer their land by System failed to come up to the expectation of
replacing the land by others landlords of the the then policy-makers, they decided to intro-
same measures of the lands. From that the tax duce the third system known as the Mahalwari
burden on the landlords was fixed, to invest into System. In this system the basis of assessment
the lands, this became the passion and attraction was th produce of a Mahal or estate and all the
for the Zamindars and the landlords of the proprietors of a Mahal were jointly and severally
Bengal. responsible in their persons and property for the
Ryotwari System sum assessed by the government on the Mahal. If
the number of proprietors was large, a few were
In the East India Company territories, the
selected as representatives of the whole and
Ryotwari System was introduced by Thomas
made responsible for the management of Mahal
Munroe and Captain Reed first in Madras presi-
and payment of the revenue. Actually, this
dency. It was later extended to Bombay, Parts of
settlement was made, constituting the whole
Bengal, Assam, Coorg, etc. This system was
village community jointly and severally. Thus, it
exactly opposite to the Zamindari system. In this
was a two-fold settlement — the ownership and
system, peasants were given the ownership and
proprietorship and they would make direct the occupancy right, that was reserved for the
payment to state as 55% of produce. But, the individual peasants and the cultivation was to be
system was such that whatever government done individually, but the peasants were jointly
calculated was faulty and exploitive. Thus, responsible for paying the land revenue to the
excessive rate of revenue made the agriculture state. The village as a whole through its head-
unprofitable. Then, the ways of collecting reve- man or Lambardar, was required to pay the
nue were so harsh and rigid that the peasants revenue. The Mahalwari System was first
would like to handover their ryots to some adopted in Agra and Awadh and later extended
money lenders. It is not that uniformly all the to other parts of the united provinces.
Social Science-8 31