Page 31 - SST Class 08
P. 31

raised and this was between the British East India     tillers were recognised as proprietors. Under the
             Company  and  the  Landlords  of  Bengal.  Lord        Ryotwari settlement system, the company recog-
             Cornwallis,  who  was  the  British  East  India’s     nised  mirasdars  as  the  sole  proprietors  of  land,
             leader  had  come  to  India  as  the  post  of        dismissing  tenants’  rights  completely.  Only  in
             Governor-General.                                      villages where no mirasdars system existed, were

             The  Permanent  Settle-                                the villagers holding permanent occupancy rights
             ment  of  the  Bengal  was                             recognised  as  landholders  responsible  for  the
             the  famous  measures  of                              payment  of  land  revenue.  The  impacts  were
             Lord  Cornwallis.  It  cre-                            more visible such as :
             ated  the  agreement  that                             g    the supply side of land increased and land
             the landlords will have to                                  prices fell.
             be  perpetual  and  heredi-                            g    Interest  rates  increased.  The  rates  were  so
             tary rights on the lands, it                                high  that  the  cultivator  was  at  best  could
             will  be  the  start  as  they                              pay only interest.
             will  pay  the  full  amount
             till  the  fixed  revenue  to                          Mahalwari System
             the British Government.         Lord Cornwallis        When the Zamindari System as well as Ryotwari

             They  have  the  rights  to  transfer  their  land  by   System  failed  to  come  up  to  the  expectation  of
             replacing  the  land  by  others  landlords  of  the   the  then  policy-makers,  they  decided  to  intro-
             same  measures  of  the  lands.  From  that  the  tax   duce  the  third  system  known  as  the  Mahalwari
             burden on the landlords was fixed, to invest into      System.  In  this  system  the  basis  of  assessment
             the lands, this became the passion and attraction      was th produce of a Mahal or estate and all the
             for  the  Zamindars  and  the  landlords  of  the      proprietors of a Mahal were jointly and severally
             Bengal.                                                responsible in their persons and property for the
             Ryotwari System                                        sum assessed by the government on the Mahal. If
                                                                    the number of proprietors was large, a few were
             In  the  East  India  Company  territories,  the
                                                                    selected  as  representatives  of  the  whole  and
             Ryotwari  System  was  introduced  by  Thomas
                                                                    made responsible for the management of Mahal
             Munroe and Captain Reed first in Madras presi-
                                                                    and  payment  of  the  revenue.  Actually,  this
             dency. It was later extended to Bombay, Parts of
                                                                    settlement  was  made,  constituting  the  whole
             Bengal,  Assam,  Coorg,  etc.  This  system  was
                                                                    village community jointly and severally. Thus, it
             exactly opposite to the Zamindari system. In this
                                                                    was a two-fold settlement — the ownership and
             system, peasants were given the ownership and
             proprietorship  and  they  would  make  direct         the  occupancy  right,  that  was  reserved  for  the
             payment  to  state  as  55%  of  produce.  But,  the   individual peasants and the cultivation was to be
             system  was  such  that  whatever  government          done  individually,  but  the  peasants  were  jointly
             calculated  was  faulty  and  exploitive.  Thus,       responsible  for  paying  the  land  revenue  to  the
             excessive  rate  of  revenue  made  the  agriculture   state.  The  village  as  a  whole  through  its  head-
             unprofitable.  Then,  the  ways  of  collecting  reve-  man  or  Lambardar,  was  required  to  pay  the
             nue  were  so  harsh  and  rigid  that  the  peasants   revenue.  The  Mahalwari  System  was  first
             would  like  to  handover  their  ryots  to  some      adopted in Agra and Awadh and later extended
             money  lenders.  It  is  not  that  uniformly  all  the   to other parts of the united provinces.


                                                       Social Science-8   31
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36